平和英语村
 

你还要被英语“虐”多久?

 

出国面签,口语不过关,
面试官的脸说黑就黑!

国际贸易,沟通不顺畅,
天价订单说飞就飞!

人在职场,英语不行,
升职加薪无望!

出国面签,口语不过关,
面试官的脸说黑就黑!

国际贸易,沟通不顺畅,
天价订单说飞就飞!

人在职场,英语不行,
升职加薪无望!

 

 

脱口而出的英语
不需要漫长的等待

 

What?学好英语需要一年半载?

花费的时间、错过的机遇、投入的汗水……你都算好了?

其实,脱口而出的英语不需要漫长的等待

在这里,英语就这样张口就来!

 

30+

专业中外教团队

13+

每天长时英语浸泡

<20

主课小班人数

1

“学-练-用”课程一体化

 

 

成人全日制英语课程
The Immersion Experience

 

 

封闭式管理,纯英语环境,采用『浸泡式』
学习法,
按测试水平入学分班,小班教学。
英语是唯一的
校内通行语言,力求每位
学员在较短的时间 内真正
内化英语,
实现流利英语脱口而出的梦想。

全日制三大优势,
英语不止在课堂!

 

“与世隔绝”,Sorry!
这段时间我只与英语作伴!

 

全封闭

衣食住学 English Only,
听说训练满分 Get!

 

浸泡式

纯英语环境,
 厨房大叔和清洁阿姨都能飚英语!

 

纯英语

全封闭

“与世隔绝”,Sorry!
这段时间我只与英语作伴!

浸泡式

衣食住行 English Only,
听说训练满分 get!

纯英语

100%纯英语,
厨房大叔和清洁阿姨
都能飚英语!

 

 

 

 

 

40 名中外教,打造国际文化氛围!

 

具备丰富教学经验的外教团队,
教师来自十几个国家,均持有外国专家证书及 TESOL 国际教师资格证,
融英语教学于生活, 营造浓郁国际文化氛围,
让您在这小小的联合国中尽情享受异国风情和多元文化交融之体验。

 

Kevin老师
 
Kelly老师
 
Simon老师
 
Vincent老师
 
Glenn老师

 

了解更多国际师资
国际师资
国际师资
40+ 名专业中外教
给你想要的优质教学

 

5-10年丰富教学经验的外教团队

100%持有外国专家资格证和tesol教师资格证

 

马上评估您的学习费用

马上评估您的学习费用

学英语目的
可支配学习时长
※ 隐私声明
免费英语学习资料 > 英语听力

VOA 常速 - President Obama Plans First Visit to Detroit Auto Show

时间:2016-11-28 10:00:18  
来源:www.pinghe.com  作者:平和英语村

Welcome to www.pinghe.com !

 

President Obama Plans First Visit to Detroit Auto Show
January 18, 2016

On the sprawling floor of Detroit’s Cobo Center, site of the 2016 North American International Auto Show, the latest and greatest vehicles, and the technology going into them, are at center stage for the international press.

Amid the glitz and glamour and shiny metal and chrome of this annual ritual for the automotive world, it’s easy to forget how close the U.S. auto industry came to complete collapse.

“When I was here in 2008, 2009, there was just a sense of depression, frankly, and fear,” describes U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat. “Because we weren’t sure what was going to happen.”

Stabenow’s colleague in the U.S. Senate, Gary Peters, also a Democrat from Michigan, remembers just how dire the situation was. “When we would walk around this auto show in 2008 and 2009 we weren’t sure if some of these automakers would survive, whether or not General Motors and Chrysler would be around.”

In the frigid Detroit winter of January 2009, the scene outside the Cobo Center reflected those concerns. At the time, General Motors and Chrysler, two of the big three U.S. automakers, were on the verge of bankruptcy, iced by an economic downturn that forced many Americans to skip new vehicle purchases. Just over 13 million new vehicles left dealer lots in the U.S. in 2008. By 2009 that number dipped to just above 10 million.

Comeback from life support

Assembly lines halted, and thousands of workers like Frank Warren were laid off. “The event that led to my latest round of layoffs was a bunch of bad decisions being made by a bunch of executives being overpaid themselves,” he explained. “We had no idea we were on the verge of bankruptcy.”

The solution to the meltdown was for the U.S. government to finance loans to the struggling U.S. automakers.

“All we’re asking for is some help here, and they call it a bailout,” said Daimler Chrysler employee Keith Kennedy at the time. “They’re not bailing anybody out. It’s a loan.”

The Buick Avista concept car is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.
The Buick Avista concept car is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.


“In the 2008 meltdown, the auto industry was on life support,” says University of Michigan Law Professor John Pottow, who describes the U.S.government’s role in the crisis. “They basically came in as if they were a giant hedge fund, and said, we’re going to let you borrow some money on our bankruptcy terms, and that will be enough to fund your restructuring.”

The plan had its detractors.

“No amount of government stimulation is ever going get us back on our feet," said Tea Party supporter Jeff McQueen during an organized protest against the loans outside Cobo Center during the 2010 North American International Auto Show.

Risky move

Senator Gary Peters says the loans were indeed a risky move for President Barack Obama, who succeeded President George W. Bush as the meltdown in the auto industry accelerated. “Had that disappeared, and with the loans, it would have been catastrophic for him. He may not have been able to survive a re-election.”

Peters served as member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time of the crisis, and was part of the Michigan delegation urging the president to act to save those auto companies in trouble.

“We all fought very aggressively to make sure that the funding was available for our companies to get through a very tough time and President Obama made some tough decisions,” Peters told VOA during an interview at the 2016 North American International Auto Show. “He was attacked by a lot of folks around the country who thought he should not help the auto industry.”

Pottow says the auto industry today may have looked very different if the Obama administration listened to those recommendations. “We might have shut one or two of them down had things gone the other way.”

A Chevrolet Bolt EV electric vehicle is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.
A Chevrolet Bolt EV electric vehicle is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.


But the government’s involvement was immediately clear to General Motors employee Matt Slade, who credits the loans with saving his job. "They kept thousands of people, especially in Michigan and the metro Detroit area, working,” he told VOA in an interview in 2010. “It's not the perfect scenario; however, it did save our industry.”

Fast forward to 2015

“We’re coming off of the best sales year ever for American vehicles, ever, for 2015,” explains Senator Debbie Stabenow. “We’re totally back.”

Back, but not the same.

While many assembly lines in the region are busy churning out new, more fuel-efficient vehicles, the restructuring led to the elimination of several brands altogether, such as GM’s Pontiac and Hummer.

Although employment figures for the Big 3 U.S. automakers in Detroit are close to their pre-recession numbers, U.S. Senator Gary Peters says they are still down from recent highs.

A Chevrolet Camaro SS Convertible is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.
A Chevrolet Camaro SS Convertible is displayed at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, Jan. 12, 2016.


“Even though they are making more cars, you don’t see the kind of increases in employment you would have seen in years past,” says Peters.

“A lot of people are back working in the industry,” says Stabenow. “A lot of people are back working in the parts supplier industry. We actually have more jobs in the parts suppliers than we do the manufacturers themselves.”

Those brands that remain are now the showpieces of more advanced, marketable automotive technology, and that’s what’s fueling the resurgence of jobs in Michigan, says Kevin Kerrigan, Senior Vice President with the Michigan Economic Development Corporation.

“Seventy-six percent of the research and development money that is spent in the U.S. is spent here in Michigan,” he says.

“I think innovation, I think technology, I think the bigger picture [is] what consumers are going to want down the road, are the true driving factor in what saved the auto industry,” says U.S. automotive expert Michael Caudill from the floor of this year’s Auto Show. “I think the auto industry saved itself.”

When President Obama visits the 2016 North American International Auto Show on January 20, he will get an up-close look at the newest technology and innovations in an industry his administration is partially responsible for saving, says University of Michigan professor John Pottow.

“President Bush started it, President Obama took it and ran with it,” he explains. “I do think they get credit because I do think there was a very significant possibility, certainly some people were advising, that you should just let the car companies fail, let them go their own way. And by backing them with that restructure, with that necessary capital, was the money that they needed to keep surviving; you do see healthy, smaller to be sure, but still healthy car companies.”


本文链接:http://www.phenglish.cn/listening/2016-11-28/105.html

 

※ 隐私声明
在线咨询
电话咨询